Well, as was mentioned, it's always difficult when you have so many commodities that you're representing.
At the end of the day, our policy on defending supply management comes at the wish of our membership. The membership around our table has supported the policy of defending supply management, so we continue forward. It doesn't mean that we don't support other aspects of agriculture as well, because we represent everybody, by and large, by default, from some of our provincial general farm organizations that sit around our table.
As I mentioned, you don't necessarily have to give up one for the other. I will go back to CETA as a prime example, in which there was consensus to bring dairy imports into Canada, yet we've seen almost no reciprocation by the European Union from a trade standpoint with respect to agriculture. If we can't gain access by giving up supply management, maybe we should stop giving up supply management until people are willing to give us access to other products.