No, I would not.
Canadian agriculture is very vast, very wide and very broad. It covers a lot of commodities—some 250 different commodities— and in a trade negotiation, that's a lot to deal with from a negotiating standpoint.
I think we have around 10,000 lines in trade negotiations that include agriculture. The supply-managed sector makes up 1% of the total number of discussions that go on in the trade negotiations with respect to agriculture, so why are we continuing to sacrifice only that sector as we go forward?