Thank you for the question.
At the end of the day, this can't be about a zero-sum game. We can have a robust and vibrant supply-managed system domestically and still have tremendous opportunities for other commodities internationally.
I don't think we need to continue to have one sector of our agriculture that's constantly first on the agenda for cutting in a trade negotiation. It doesn't have to be that way. Supply management has proven over the last 50 years how strong it is, not only domestically in supporting farmers but also for the economy as a whole, and that can continue going forward, so I don't think we have to have one without the other. It's not that you're taking something off the table right off the bat, and therefore somebody else has to give up. It doesn't have to be that kind of a game. We have tremendous commodities production here in Canada and we have lots of opportunities for those products to go worldwide.