Madam Chair, we wouldn't typically include a review clause, but it's something we often include.
In this case, we included it because there are such fundamental elements of the agreement that weren't included. We didn't include services or investment, for example. Cross-border trade in services and investment are fundamental to our FTAs, so we included that provision, with the full support of the Ukrainian government, because we recognized that at the time their regulatory system was in such flux that they weren't sure what they were going to be able to agree to. We didn't want a situation where we potentially came away from the negotiations with an agreement that walked back even the protections we had in our 1995 foreign investment protection and promotion agreement.
We put in the review clause with the idea that within two years we would look to see how we could deal with cross-border trade in services, financial services, investment and a number of other areas. It was fully anticipated this would happen, and it was fully supported by both parties at the time.