Thanks for the question.
Brian and I coordinate on this because I think we all have the same interest. It is extremely important for 100% regulatory alignment with Washington in the automotive sector. I say “Washington” because sometimes we look at Sacramento and we say that we like what's happening with the California Air Resources Board. We think it's a little bit more aggressive. They appear to be putting together a coalition of states that represent about 40% of the market, and it's the highest standard.
We all work in a business. Cars and parts work in a single-digit EBITDA world. That's by making one vehicle platform and one type of part for one configuration to sell all over North America. While it may be attractive to create a bit of an island so that you can provide a narrative in Canada—a leadership narrative, noble as it is—it does put Canadian manufacturing at a disadvantage, because what will happen, which we've seen happen specifically, is that companies will either have to create a “subnational jurisdiction only” product or they'll pull the product.