Thank you for the question, but I don't think I'm here today to represent just some of them, because frankly, there are so many that I would be picking and choosing a bit too much.
I could mention that I was preparing myself to appear at a meeting in Brussels a couple of weeks ago. As soon as I put on LinkedIn that I was going to be appearing before a committee in Brussels, people started reaching out to me, mentioning different things. One specifically, without getting into the exact company, was somebody who made mining equipment—somebody I knew from a past life in the mining industry—who was saying that the EU legislation on safety regulations was preventing their equipment from going easily into the EU. As a Canadian who has worked in the mining industry, I think it's quite obvious that Canadian-made mining equipment has to be meeting the same standards. It's strictly a non-tariff barrier that needs to be worked through in these discussion groups.
That's the case for almost everything. When you're talking about people of good faith who are blocking your product, it's really a question of getting into these regulatory co-operation mechanisms so you can talk through the issue and get to the proper result. That's as long as what we're talking about are people of good faith who are blocking something because they don't have an exact understanding of it. If you're talking about a situation in which people aren't acting in good faith and are just trying to block your product, that's when I think political capital needs to be expended.