Well, in the context of CPTPP, a lot of the non-tariff trade barriers were addressed. It doesn't necessarily mean that they don't emerge in various ways. That's because the agreement is complex, and in many cases it's technical.
I think the big markets we're talking about need to be addressed in a Canada-ASEAN free trade agreement. In terms of how and where, we should be putting our emphasis on the type of agreement we had with the CPTPP. It's really the gold standard of agreements. If we can replicate it.... It would be much more difficult in ASEAN, as you can imagine, because of the types of countries that are part of ASEAN, but there's no harm in trying.
In the context of India, which is, again, a really important market for us, we've tried. As I said, when I left Delhi in 2014, we'd already gone through seven rounds of negotiations. There are lots of other issues there that are hindering a completion of a comprehensive economic partnership agreement. I think an early progress agreement will hopefully, in the context of what we're willing to offer and what they're willing to offer, deal with some of the most important NTBs. That's all part of what negotiators need to be able to understand. It's going to require us to give in some areas. Hopefully, the Indians will reciprocate.
Again, our focus should be on dealing at the front end with some of those big issues that we need to deal with. Some of them are almost impossible to complete, just due to the nature of the Indian economy and how we approach it, but it's at least something that we should try, and we should find areas where there's common ground. Hopefully, we can offer something that's attractive enough to lead them to deal with some of the agriculture NTBs, which are really important to the Canadian economy, particularly the agricultural economy.