Thanks for the question.
Obviously, it's a difficult market. That's why what we're talking about is an early progress trade agreement. I think it's significant, by the way, that this is kind of a new approach for Canadian trade negotiators to accept less than a full deal, to take less than a full loaf, when it comes to a trade agreement, where we aim for very high standards.
I don't have a recommendation on a specific lesson learned from the Australians' experience. I think it's important for us to be watching these things very closely. Australia would be a closer analogue to Canada than the U.K., which is also in similar negotiations with India, because of the nature of our economies.
When you're looking at these things, you also have to look at what's in the other deal, at what they got and what they conceded, in the language of trade agreements. I mean, these things should always be win-win, but there are concessions and there are things that you feel you get. We need to really look at what it was the Australians needed to concede and see if we're comfortable with making similar concessions in the Canadian context. While we have similarities with the Australian economy as a major commodity exporter, we're not exactly the same, either.