Thanks for the question.
I think there are a couple of things on this one.
For one, the only market in the world where pulses are politically sensitive and often subject to protectionism is India's. That's why, in this future agreement—not an agreement that we've negotiated already—it's going to be extremely important for us to address that.
To your question around agreements that have been signed—whether it be CETA or CPTPP—I think CPTPP has been important in reducing duties in some of these markets where we're trying to diversify away from some of our historical markets—like China and like India—into new markets. That has been important, but at the same time, we've still seen NTBs arise. A specific example would be in Vietnam, where their regulation of wheat seed, without any apparent technical justification, has hindered our ability to grow our exports into that market.
I'd say that with CETA, more generally, we do have concerns around some of the stated policy directions from the EU when it comes to things like mirror clauses and their regulation of crop protection products and how that may—not currently but in the future—present some real non-tariff barriers for Canadian pulses. More broadly, those agreements are important for us in our diversification efforts.