Thank you.
I'll continue with Mr. Laird on that topic.
It seems that there's a trend recently with some of the free trade agreements around the world for these investor-state dispute mechanisms to be pulled out of agreements, especially where you have countries that seem to have a mature and robust judicial system and investors can use the courts. For instance, although the investor-state mechanism is enshrined in CPTPP, I heard recently that Australia and the U.K. signed a side letter agreement to remove it, in a bilateral way, when the U.K. accesses to that agreement. It's also come out of CUSMA.
I'm wondering whether you can comment on that trend.
As Monsieur Savard-Tremblay mentioned, there is this opposite effect, where it really does hamper what local governments, provincial governments and federal governments here can do in terms of new legislation around labour practices, environmental issues, etc.