Thank you.
As Mr. Fowler was explaining before, we have litigation in two different fora: the WTO, and before NAFTA and CUSMA panels.
With respect to the WTO, the appellate body impasse, which we've all been working to try to resolve, has essentially meant that any case that is pending appeal cannot be considered anymore. It's not moving forward in the WTO dispute settlement system.
With respect to NAFTA and CUSMA panels, under chapter 19 and chapter 10, that's essentially a system that is set up where the NAFTA or CUSMA panel steps into the role of the Court of International Trade, which is a court of first instance in the United States, that considers whether or not the imposition of duties is in accordance with U.S. law.
In that context, we've had delays and problems with the nomination of panellists, and we are committed to working with the United States to ensure the panellists are impartial. As Mr. Fowler touched on before, there are very many practitioners in trade in Washington, D.C., but a lot of them have touched softwood lumber. I think one of the issues that we've had is that, when panellists have been put forward, sometimes we've had concerns over their previous involvement in the case.
I hope that helps.