Yes, we would agree. Dispute resolution mechanisms need to be in place in all FTAs and all provisions—SPS or TBT—need to fall under these dispute mechanisms.
We also think it's important to have provisions on issues that we know could potentially become non-tariff barriers—for example, MRLs in the case that we just discussed. We have a good example of that in the CUSMA and in the CPTPP, where the Government of Canada was the one pushing for negotiating new provisions, new texts and new obligations for countries for these issues that could potentially be barriers to trade. It will be I think very important that these new provisions and these new and stronger texts be included and be part of the dispute settlement mechanism.