Could I ask you one further question, Representative Higgins?
Right now, as the regulation stands, there are certain exemptions, but the exemptions don't apply, meaning that you are subject to the tax if you own multiple properties. I presume you don't have any issue with people who have multiple properties being subject to this tax. You're talking more about that mom and pop who have one property in Canada in one of these more remote locations, which they are actually using.
Is that fair? Do I have your position accurate?