I'll repeat the question.
I understand that the gravamen of your concern is that there's a 28-day exemption. If you're using it for 28 days or more, that's great, but it only applies to certain eligible areas. In terms of the way an eligible area is defined, whether a place is rural or urban, that net has been cast a bit too wide based on the census that we're using as a criterion.
That is my understanding. Is that correct?
Secondly, how would you propose that we redefine what an eligible location is for this exemption?