That's an excellent question.
Because we have a number of cases through different venues with NAFTA, CUSMA and the WTO, maybe it's more broadly on the issue of the WTO appellate body that we were very much encouraged to see the United States, through other WTO parties, agree to restore functionality. I think we still have some way to go to get to that point in time, but we see that as an opening to restore the body.
There are U.S. stakeholders that have also been very supportive of getting to that point in time. Canada is a leader through the Ottawa Group in engaging countries toward reforming and restoring functionality to the WTO, so Canada is in an excellent position with its partners to intensify its efforts with the United States, to get us to a point such that we can restore that body. It could become a vehicle whereby we can at least address this dispute or, for the future, have a functioning dispute settlement system globally.
In terms of what an actual softwood lumber agreement would include, including if we were to drop certain cases, I don't know how that process would play out or what would be preferable to certain industry groups, but we see the restoration of the dispute settlement system at the WTO as a positive step in addressing this dispute and others.