Thank you for the question, once again.
The idea of cumulative regulatory burden is one of the things we need to spend more time looking at. For example, we're talking right now about the biocides regulations, but the manufacturers of those products are also dealing with new regulations from ECCC around recyclability. We're also dealing with new regulations around packaging materials and pollution reduction.
All those initiatives don't necessarily align. Manufacturers are put into very challenging positions, and the lack of stability, the lack of predictability.... If you're in the middle of taking on a project, for example, right now, there's a whole relabelling initiative for natural health products under way, and then halfway through the implementation exercise—whoops—ECCC now says we have to put new labelling information on the front of the product label, so now that whole relabelling exercise has to take a step back.
We could point to a lot of different examples like that, where there is this whole concept of the cumulative burden. It's not just any one exercise or one regulatory framework, but it's the number of overlapping regulatory frameworks that industry is dealing with.