Thank you for that.
The Canada-Ukraine foreign investment promotion and protection agreement—FIPA—that was in place in 1995 is what has kind of come into this agreement. I think, as I said earlier in response to another question, this provision was very much requested by my Ukrainian colleagues, because they understood what's in front of them, which is a very high need on their part to attract investments. Canadian investors and businesses look to this as a mechanism that will give them that certainty, so it's a certainty going the other way.
To address the last part of your question, we've had no ISDS cases under our FIPA with Ukraine since 1995. We've had that with them for over 20 years or 30 years now, and there has not been one. I think that gives us a degree of confidence from that standpoint. There's that, but there's also Canada's retaining of the right to regulate—non-derogation—so this is not about an agreement that is a race to the bottom. This is about the ability to have the policy flexibility to maintain our ability to deal with issues like the environment or labour or indigenous rights.
I hope that answers that.