Thank you, Ambassador.
I think that's a key word that you used. This CUFTA agreement will then become a transition document, as accession to CETA begins. It's kind of interesting to note that there's no mention of a carbon tax or carbon leakage in CETA, to the best of my knowledge and that of my colleagues from our review of the document.
In the interim and in that transition period, we're going to be talking about the rebuilding of Ukraine, which is vitally important. The ambassador who was here earlier indicated that at a minimum $400 billion will be needed. Would it not, therefore, be prudent to have included chapters related specifically to the reconstruction and rebuilding of Ukraine as we move on that transition towards accession to CETA, in the short term? The reconstruction and the rebuilding that will be required in Ukraine is hugely important.
Have we missed an opportunity by not including chapters specifically regarding energy co-operation and energy security?