Again, Madam Chair, I'll be very brief.
On the question of delays, we have put forward a motion that is very much on the matter that is being debated. It proposes giving the committee powers to consider more amendments. I would suggest to members that if they're unsure how they feel about those amendments, they should support this motion allowing more scope for those amendments. Then, if they don't like those subsequent amendments, they can come forward to vote against them.
This motion does not compel the committee to adopt certain future amendments. It simply gives the committee power to consider a broader range of amendments. Members can do consultation as they like, but in terms of this delaying things, this leads to no delays. This allows the consideration of additional amendments on an issue that I would assume all members of Parliament would be well versed on. That is the urgency of delivering munitions to Ukraine that will allow it to achieve victory. This is not a prescriptive motion; it gives the committee more room to manoeuvre in the future.
In that sense, I don't think it's complicated. I think it's very reasonable. It aligns with what is at least the stated position of most members of Parliament.
That will probably be the last thing I say on this. I don't see why it should be difficult to support this fairly quickly.