The point I was trying to make briefly in my presentation was that Canadian companies don't need this to make investments. The only things stopping Canadian companies from investing in Ukraine right now are war, mines and uncertainty about where the borders are going to be drawn after this all settles. There's been a FIPA in place since 1994, and Canadian investment in Ukraine has been pitiful over the past 20 years. It's not like the treaty is going to attract more investment.
As I was saying in my presentation, it simply continues to tie the hands of the Ukrainian government, I suppose. They're signing these treaties because they need investment, and they're desperate. People like the OECD and other countries tell them that these treaties are essential for that.
The evidence of their existing 60 agreements is that this is not the case. They obviously need something more than these agreements to attract investment, and that's going to come post war, whatever the situation is. It's going to be difficult, but the treaties themselves clearly don't provide that incentive to get in there.