I'm sorry, Mr. Savard-Tremblay; it's not subject to debate. I've made the ruling that it is inadmissible.
The mover has asked for a recorded vote on whether the ruling of the chair should be sustained.
(Ruling of the chair sustained: yeas 6; nays 5)
(Clause 40 agreed to on division)
All right. We'll see if we can get a little bit further here.
Shall the short title carry?