Sure. Thanks for the question, Mr. Cannings.
Our members, as I said in my opening remarks, in the past few years—as we all have—have faced supply chain challenges from the pandemic and from the wildfires and the atmospheric rivers. There were supply chain disruptions as a result of the atmospheric rivers particularly.
Mr. Sheehan spoke to this earlier. As we think about the trade opportunities in the Indo-Pacific, we need to ensure—particularly in British Columbia—that our roads, rails and ports are resilient in the face of those challenges, so we've advocated to both orders of government the need for investment in those areas.
In respect of the strike situation last summer, our position would be that we do support free and collective bargaining and we do believe the best outcomes are achieved at a bargaining table, but we also support business continuity. It's absolutely critical that the waterfront in our west coast ports be accessible and be fluid to support the export of our commodities and the inbound materials we need in order to operate.
A strike of any duration—or a lockout, for that matter—should not be tolerated, and that's why the section 106 review is timely—to figure out what the tools are that can be deployed when we bargain to impasse and what the timing points are around the deployment of those kinds of tools.