I'm sorry; I was locked out of my computer. It crashed.
This case is very concerning. Just for a very brief context, for over 20 years, communities in the páramo of Kimsakocha in southern Ecuador have been mobilizing peacefully against Canadian mining companies. Different companies have tried to advance gold projects in the highlands. Since then, because of this peaceful resistance for over 20 years, communities have organized themselves, and they have called for citizen-led referendums. These citizen-led referendums are part of the constitution, whereby communities can decide whether they want extractive mega projects in their territories.
In the last 10 years, at least three citizen-led referendums have been organized by the communities and, in all of them, at least 70% to 80%—in one of them, 90%—of the population have fought against Canadian mining.
It terms of answering your question, yes, last year and just a few weeks ago, concerning the Loma Larga project of Dundee Precious Metals in the páramo, there was a constitutional order that confirmed the suspension of the project because the indigenous communities had not been consulted. The project didn't get the free, prior and informed consent from the communities. For over one and a half years, the local court, the provincial court and now the constitutional court have reaffirmed that there was no free, prior and informed consent from the indigenous communities. In fact, we are aware that, at some point, the company denied the existence of indigenous peoples in the páramo of Kimsakocha.
As you see, this is one reason that communities in Ecuador don't want extractive mega projects in their territories. They have already said no to them. That's why in one of our recommendations, one of our asks, we echo communities when they say that if they have already said no to mining projects, their right to say no must be respected.
I would also like to echo very briefly that we need to hear from folks in Ecuador. There has not been an opportunity for communities in Ecuador to voice their concerns regarding this free trade agreement. If we are talking about an inclusive free trade agreement, voices from Ecuador need to be part of this conversation. So far that has not been the case.