Thank you, Madam Chair.
There are some well-intentioned NGOs in Canada that advocate on behalf of the people of Ecuador—not all people, because obviously the government and the majority of the people of Ecuador welcome foreign trade agreements. Just to give a parallel example, a couple of hundred people in Quebec, led by Greenpeace, protested against the Northvolt $7-billion investment in Quebec, employing 3,000 people to manufacture batteries. Based on that, if the people in Sweden advocated to their government that the people of Canada are protesting, so let's not talk trade or investment in Canada....
We have to understand that the global south is changing. I know you mentioned human rights, gender equality and other social issues. I hope we know that Canada, as a developed country, can't be seen to be lecturing or preaching. I think we have to use our words carefully. We have to be more prudent and pragmatic. However, the well-intentioned arguments against Canadian business, against Canadian interests and against the free trade agreement that we intend to have with Ecuador are, in my view, a bit problematic.
When Canadian investments or any investments go to a country like Ecuador.... It is a middle-income country, it is not a poor country like many countries in Asia and Africa. Still, when investment goes there, with Canada being the largest foreign investor there, it creates economic development opportunities. It create jobs for Ecuadorean people. It creates infrastructure—roads, power generation plants, hospitals, schools. Those are the kinds of positive multiplier effects of the investment that goes in there. That should also be considered.
Talking of considerations, you did mention that the chief economist measured the benefits that this agreement can bring into Canada, which apparently are a bit modest. Did that economist calculate the lost economic opportunity costs from not having a free trade agreement wherein our competitors, to take the example of supplying lentils or wheat, have a free trade agreement, causing a potential loss of Canadian trade with Ecuador?