That's an important question. I think what we're saying is that it's important in any of these agreements. Certainly, right now, we have mutual recognition of food-safety systems between the U.S. and Canada. As I understand it, CFIA is still pursuing one with New Zealand. That is the extent of it at this point, but these types of mutual recognition are so important.
Of course, it might have been Mr. English, or it may have been Monsieur Roy who noted the recognition of CFIA internationally for its standards and for its capacity, especially when we come to something like mutual recognition of food-safety systems. That's what we're trying to get at. If this is pursued, we are always looking for a recognition that our food-safety standards must be upheld in any trade agreement.
In other words, we do not want to import product that would have in any way a detrimental impact on our industry, and of course, we don't want to put our domestic producers in a situation where there may be...notwithstanding the fact that most of the product coming in is tropical, so it's not something they're producing. However, we don't want to in any way introduce any kind of unfair imbalance in terms of what food-safety expectations are for imported products as opposed to domestic products.
It would certainly be the same if they were exporting to Ecuador. We would want them to uphold the same food-safety standards. That's why mutual recognition is so important, because then you have a level playing field, with fair expectations on both sides.