We don't want to put the library or Parliament at risk because of accessibility. That is why we have not moved on this file.
In the meantime, we began discussions with the House and our administration counterparts, who undertook discussions with the Privy Council. I am not aware of the reasons why, but they began their work with the petitions. I think the 2014 motion had more to do with the questions on the order paper.
In light of the progress that was made at the House, we decided to pause to see what the discussions with the House would lead to. According to recent conversations that were held last week, they are continuing their discussions, and apparently Privy Council is now more willing to move forward.
I'm not certain that there is a “blockage”, but as my colleague suggested, the intervention should really be brought to bear on the production of the document as such. But we are not in a position to do that.