What we want to do is avoid a situation where someone would file a complaint saying that it is not accessible enough and that they would be able to show that we haven't done enough as an institution.
In those types of situations, the processes will look at what the institution did. What efforts did it make? Did it turn its mind to accessibility? Did it explore the necessary solutions? Did it work with the partners to ensure a solution?
That is why, as my colleague is saying, we are looking at all those things when we make information available on our websites: Is it accessible? Is it accessible in a timely manner? If there are challenges to that accessibility, do we have the tools to get it done? If we don't, and this is one instance where the timeliness of the publication is a challenge, are we working with our partners in the government asking them to make those documents accessible at source so that when we receive them we're able to immediately publish in a way that is fully accessible?