I feel most strongly about those situations in which death is reasonably foreseeable. I think there are some interesting constitutional arguments, because of course with adults the decision in Quebec required that medical assistance in dying must be made available whether death is or is not reasonably foreseeable.
I think a decision to only allow medical assistance in dying for adolescents who have a reasonably foreseeable death would be constitutionally very questionable as a political decision. As something that might be supported more broadly, it would probably be easier to achieve support for individuals whose death is reasonably foreseeable.
But constitutionally—