Thank you for that. That was an answer.
We've heard concerns about the fact that, like every other field of medicine, the development of treatments is always expanding. New research is going on, etc. I guess some of our witnesses have related their concern that someone could qualify for medical assistance in dying, and then maybe in a few years' time a treatment comes out that is successful in treating that condition—we don't yet know.
Can you clarify whether physicians, especially assessors, would consider it a duty of care to have done their research into the most advanced state of research that's available for treatment right now? Can you just expand on that a bit more?