Excuse me for interrupting, but I'd like to move on to another witness. It's not a problem if you didn't understand my question.
Dr. Barbès-Morin, some members of your association claim there's always a treatment to relieve suffering. Many oppose offering medical assistance in dying, since incurability is not necessarily a foregone conclusion in many cases.
In your opinion, does claiming that there's always a treatment to relieve suffering and asserting that there's no need for medical assistance in dying amount to medical paternalism, or a kind of therapeutic obstinacy in psychiatric practice? This was said in Quebec.