Thank you for that question.
Yes, I believe that the expert panel recommendations are very comprehensive and thorough. I have thought about that at length, and I can't think of anything that I would want to add or feel the need to add. Partly, I say that because I think the pre-existing safeguards that are already in place for track two are quite thorough if they are followed appropriately by assessors and providers.
Along with the recommendation in the panel report that assessors and providers be trained in a standardized way.... I hope you know that there are training programs being developed, and I'm part of the development of those training modules. If assessors receive that additional training, they can provide assessments in a more standardized way and they can follow the existing guidelines and the safeguards that are already there, plus the additional elements that are added in through the panel report, which refine what is already there and allow assessors to interpret the current legislation even more clearly.
I am quite satisfied with the way the report elaborates on that. My only concern is making sure that it is followed and that the recommendations are implemented locally.