I would distinguish between access to treatment and access to social supports—housing support, income support and things like that—because, if a person has not already undergone extensive treatment, so has necessarily had access to a lot of treatment already, it won't be possible to conclude that their condition is incurable, their decline irreversible and so forth. It's this wait for treatment itself that forecloses people from access to MAID, because they won't have that track record of experience in treatment to demonstrate that it didn't work.
My comments about funding were directed more to the section of track two that refers to exploring available community supports. We recommended that, for those community supports, the language in the law be interpreted to include things like housing, income support and so forth. I was speaking to those kinds of things in terms of ensuring that reasonable provision is made for them while understanding that, in some cases, they might help alleviate suffering, and in others, they might not.