We have done some looking at what's done in the other jurisdictions. It's taken me back to the days of the CCA report in 2018 where we looked at this in a fair amount of detail. We looked at this in this report as well.
I think some of the concepts that we have here were borrowed from those other jurisdictions, such as the idea that in addition to capacity, we would want a request to be well considered, for example. This is suggesting that something in addition to capacity is required, something that is sufficiently stable and is not fluctuating too much over time. It's concepts like this.
We suggested that this idea of “well considered” should mean the person shouldn't be able to just reply, “Yes, I understand the information here.” They should be genuinely open to the possibility that a given treatment might actually help them.
These are the sorts of ideas that we've taken from looking at the way things are done in these other jurisdictions.
In addition, the Netherlands, I believe, has a committee that looks ex post at the cases, analyzes them and provides reports and practice recommendations. These are things we looked at as useful, which we could adopt here.