I'm sorry to interrupt, but my time is running out. I do want to continue with you, though.
You were talking about the legal distinction between medical assistance in dying and palliative care. In actual medical settings, we have patients who are often in palliative care and make the decision that they want to transition to medical assistance in dying. Often it's happening in the same place. While I agree that you have the legal distinction, practically it's often happening in the same place. For lack of better purposes, it is a part of continuum of care in the practical setting.
We just heard from Dr. Zan that some patients, when they make a choice to transition from palliative care to MAID, have had to transition to a different facility because services aren't offered. In your opinion, how do we balance the rights of the institution providing the care with the rights of the patient to have that continuum of care and not have the end of life interrupted in such a severe way?
Let's say you've gone through palliative care and feel like the treatments aren't working anymore, and you don't feel like you need to stay on this earth anymore but your decision to go into medical assistance in dying means you're going to be packed up into an ambulance and transported to a different facility. How do we protect your rights versus the kind of care you're receiving?