On the legal aspect, I am not really competent to answer, but I would say yes. Yes, it is important to properly define the time when the designated person can report that their family member seems to have reached the stage that meets the criteria the person themself set. This respects their right to self-determination and their pre-established choice. So the idea of happy dementia has to be properly defined, but it will also be important that there be contemporary suffering. That idea was very important in the committee's work and it has to be retained.
On the legal aspect, I will not comment, because that is not my field. At present, we are not at that point. As I said earlier, we are going to wait for the bill to be enacted in Quebec. We will also have to consider the extent to which it will be enacted. At present, there is a lot of speculation occurring.