Is it better? All right.
I'm making this kind of statement because I do think that we are thinking as clinicians, we are thinking as family and we are thinking as lawyers about all of these things. We're not thinking about what that person is in the lucid moments, the few lucid moments—we may not even be able to talk to them in those lucid moments—when they definitely say, “I don't want to be here anymore” or “I do want to be here; I do want to continue.”
We have a really difficult problem. I think that if we try to parse this into legal constructs or into families who want their mom with them for a longer period of time and go, “Oh look, Mom looks happy. She's playing with dolls. Isn't she great?”.... These are the kinds of things that we don't want to make sure the Government of Canada or the people of Canada decide for an individual human being: what their end of life should be like and what their choices are.
I don't have an answer. We're asking you guys to come and tell us because we were hoping someone among you would give us an aha moment, but at the end of the day, I don't know that this is all about us. I know that it is about that person, that individual specific person.
We heard from Dr. Poirier. We heard from Dr. Chung—