I understand your point of view. But what's the problem? I was very surprised to hear parliamentarians tell us that the debate had not taken place.
People often refer to the example of a young person who might become quadriplegic after a car accident. That person would be denied medical assistance in dying.
From the clinical standpoint, what would happen if you had a request for medical assistance in dying further to an accident that occurred two months ago?
Do you think that a young quadriplegic, should, after two months, have access to medical assistance in dying under Canada's current act?
How do you view that from a clinical standpoint?