For me, it is how we frame vulnerability, too. What I was trying to say in my opening statement is not to shift away from thinking about vulnerability in the ways that people are personally experiencing it. It's thinking about who is vulnerable to having their rights to make that rights link, who is vulnerable to having their rights infringed upon because of policies and, potentially, extra safeguards that are not necessary, which then prevent our having further steps and hoops for people to jump through, when it's already incredibly difficult for some of these folks to access health care, end-of-life care, of which MAID is a part.
Putting it into a human rights perspective and making that link about vulnerability, not based on life circumstances alone, but vulnerability to policy and procedure, is where my thinking is right now. I think that's where your opportunity as a committee is, to really get this right when you are thinking about expanding eligibility criteria to do so, as you have done in a very intentional way, without adding unnecessary additional levels that will actually harm people who do need support.