Thanks for the question.
There are a couple of parts. If I forget some, please remind me.
I do think that we've had precedents. We've had experience in the past five years before the amendments. We saw patients who were nearing the end and were really fearful of losing the capacity to make the choice to go ahead with assisted dying. That was causing tremendous anxiety in patients and their families, to the point that we were able to give that feedback to the government. They heard that story and created the waiver of final consent for very specific populations so that they would take their medications or pain medications at the end of life and they would not withhold that from themselves in fear of losing capacity.
I think there is evidence of patients making premature choices out of fear of what's to come or fear of loss of ability to make those choices or fear of losing control. We've heard lots of talk today about advance directives. I think it has been very well established in medicine for decades now that patients do have the right to give an advance directive for their care in situations that they may not fully understand at the time, such that if they were found to be on life-sustaining medication or were being ventilated, they might choose to have that removed. They could make that choice now, clearly, in a document that we all agree must be respected. I think we have good precedents for advance directives of some sort.