Forgive me for interrupting you.
How would intervention or prohibition by the state be more honourable and more ethical? In the name of what could the state tell someone who is of sound mind and has received a firm diagnosis not to make that choice? Supported by a caring and benevolent team, the person says that when they have reached a particular condition, they have crossed the threshold of what is tolerable and they are longer capable of acting, they will want to be given medical assistance in dying. In fact, suicide has been decriminalized, I would note in passing.
How is that ethically blameworthy?