Maybe I will follow up on Senator Kutcher's question to you, Ms. Birenbaum. I will give you a few more minutes to complete your answer. I had similar questions.
How can the law navigate potential tensions between the Charter of Rights—guaranteed rights, as you referred to mentally ill patients also having rights—and the fact that we may also need to have the proper standards and training in place to protect vulnerable persons? How do we balance the absolute right, in one sense, to have access with the right to protect the vulnerable? If the conclusion of the committee is that there's not enough readiness, would you say that goes to the standards in section 1 of the charter?