In my view, there are not. I think the safeguards that we have are easily circumvented. They are already circumvented in the context of track two. I would urge committee members to watch, for example, the recent documentary by Al Jazeera, where we see Rosina Kamis receiving MAID in the context of track two. In my view, it shows that you can drive a truck through some of the requirements that are supposedly protecting people from receiving track two MAID.
I look at the practice guidelines at the CAMAP, educational documents that have been prepared, the model practice standard and the guidelines. I see an overwhelming emphasis on the need to provide access to MAID, even to such an extent that, for example, in the CAMAP documents, there is an explanation of how you can easily turn track two MAID into a track one MAID. In other words, even if you're assessed on track two.... For example, the CAMAP document states specifically that by refusing antibiotics for a serious infection, you can turn your track two into a track one.
I would say that, for me, this is symbolic of the way our regulatory approach has been in the context of track two, and this will apply to the context of mental illness.