I think one of the points Dr. Gittens made in her opening remarks is that it's really critical to look at a thorough and expansive way of assessing someone's request for MAID, whether it's someone with a mental disorder or another track two request.
To do that simply based on an interview, I think, is short-sighted and inadequate. Interviews and conversations with patients are prone to bias, and we need more objective indices of assessing someone's mental state and putting the request within the context of that mental state.
There's a very extensive body of research that goes back to the 1950s and has continued since that makes it very clear that actuarial prediction is far superior to clinical prediction. At the very least, I think that's one of the things that's necessary for us to move to a state of readiness. Look at how these assessments are done and whether that actually meets the standard.