Thanks very much, Dr. Masuda.
I'd like to go to Mr. Krausert.
Mr. Krausert, I am so glad to see that you are with us today and that you did not succumb to your bouts of depression and suicidal ideation.
You have talked a little bit about the fact that you've been helped. Obviously, this is good. All of us believe it's good. Do you believe, as Dr. Smith said earlier on, that the courts, through very long cross-examination, have actually decided in certain cases, Truchon being one, that trained psychiatrists have the ability to distinguish between suicidal ideation, which could be temporary, and a mental illness that is irreversible?
I noted that the courts also said that the ability to decide whether something is irremediable or not, or intolerable or not, is something that only a patient can decide, because they know what they're living in, they know what they believe, and they know what their options are. Given good options and all of the informed consent, a patient has the right to decide whether or not they qualify as having irremediable suffering and whether they wish to have the treatment that is being offered to them because, for them, the treatment is not something they want to accept.
Courts have ruled positively on those things. Do you agree with those things?