I interrupted you because my main argument was not about social acceptability. My main point is that we have a deadline of March 17, 2023. We're proposing something new, while there are still people to be trained. A full legislature says it has asked the preliminary question that our committee did not ask. As a legislator, I have to take that into account. This assembly asked the preliminary question and decided not to go ahead, because it found that the experts were divided and that there was not a broad enough consensus, as is the case for other aspects—Quebec has always been a pioneer.
How can we ensure that this is put into practice on the ground? It's difficult to implement a measure in the absence of a clear legal framework. The entire National Assembly of Quebec has spoken out against this. That is my main argument.
I am not saying that I am opposed to everything you say. Your report is excellent, in that it aims to present all the precautions to be taken if this were to happen, but we are not in that situation. Sometimes it's better to take the time to do things correctly.