No problem.
Part of the problem with ISAF, as an institution, is that it started off as a non-NATO organization that was neutered deliberately to get buy-in by the UN. Essentially, as far as I understand it, they couldn't get anybody to take control of ISAF, ultimately. So Canada came up with an idea where, okay, we'll take it over, but we want it “NATO-ized” so we can bring a lot more resources to bear.
There were plans at various stages, but the problem was that they had to assess what ISAF is going to do and when it is going to do it, and where does this fit vis-à-vis Operation Enduring Freedom. This split structure has been a problem, which hopefully will be eliminated when we get the RC East. This has been a problem going right back to the creation of the organization.
Under Canadian control there was a plan. The prototype of the ANDS came out of the Canadian period, but the follow-on people who took over six months later dumped it in the bin, saying, well, we don't want to be involved in this. So in the next six months somebody took over and said, well, wait a minute, maybe we should do this. There has been a continuity issue in this particular mission, I would suggest.