Thank you, Mr. Chair.
First of all, I think we all recognize that the department has been doing an outstanding job of providing us with information. I refer to the witness we had just today, Major-General Benjamin. And previous generals and members of the department have been briefing us on a regular basis, so I don't think there's actually a shortage of information. We're also getting information from the media, as Mr. Bachand indicated. I would call to question whether it is in fact the case that such a shortage is actually present.
I also agree with my colleagues, both on my side and on the other side, that weekly briefings are perhaps a bit excessive. I don't think this committee should expect the department to be providing information of a confidential nature, in light of the fact that there are few, if any, members of this committee with the top secret clearance that would be required to receive that information. So we have to keep in mind the level of expectation we have of the department.
I'm also not convinced that the mission is changing so rapidly that we would have dramatically new information on a weekly basis or even on a biweekly basis. I think expecting a more regular briefing would be in order, and I would support amending the motion to replace the word “weekly” with “regular”.
I guess, Mr. Clerk, that would be considered another subamendment.
I also want to draw to the committee's attention the fact that although the department and the government are at the behest of parliamentarians, at the same time, I don't want to put an unnecessary burden on our military, in light of the degree to which they are currently being stretched by this mission, as we have heard repeatedly.
Those are the comments that I would like to bring to this committee's attention.