I would like to take this opportunity, before the general begins, to say that today—since we are civilized people—, I am here to listen to the briefing he will deliver to us. But I want this to be clear: in my view, the committee is master of what goes on here. I say “master“ because you have already taken some of the time allotted to the presentation, discussions and interactions. I believe that, after the general's presentation, the committee might want to see whether the format is appropriate, whether the time is appropriate, and whether the issues addressed by the general are appropriate.
I want it to be clear that it is for the committee to determine the importance of these briefings. I believe we need to give them a great deal of importance. The mere fact that the minister reconsidered the decision indicates that he is on our side and he understands how important it is that members of Parliament be well informed.
It should therefore be clear, Mr. Chair. I am willing to listen to the general's presentation today, but the different issues we should address after he leaves are the following. Are we satisfied with the time we are given? Do we want more interaction with the speaker? Can we ask that specific issues be addressed, such as equipment, personnel distribution and contacts with NGOs, for example?
Unless my colleagues disagree with me, the committee must maintain control over these presentations and not just sit back and listen passively. The select committee may need to discuss this later. I wanted to raise a point of order, from the start, to make it clear that today, I will listen, but I also want to participate. If the committee wants more participation, we will need to make sure that the speakers deliver these more important presentations we are asking for.