Oh, it was my question, and I have another one.
I understand that for financial reasons, we are resorting to private sector. On the other hand, I have a second question for you and it is a bit more difficult. It is about the cost of the mission. More and more newspapers are reporting that it would cost us up to 4 billion extra dollars to go to the end of the mission in 2009. The total cost of the mission, from 2001 to 2009, would be $10 billion. Was there an error in evaluating the cost of the Afghanistan operation, or does the current situation oblige us to send tanks and perhaps even F-18s? With all this, the bill is adding up enormously, and the public will say that this is very expensive. Was there an error in evaluating the cost of the mission, or do we just have to adapt to the current situation?