It was kind of implied that the army might have been surprised by the extension of the mission. Can you comment on the mission readiness and whether it's the army, navy, or air force that have standing units ready to deploy to NATO or wherever, so that if a requirement comes up on relatively short notice, the army, navy, or air force is prepared to respond? That would give you time, then, to crank the rest of the reinforcement or sustainment troops up and to get that going. Correct me if I'm wrong, but the army is in the state to deploy from the get-go to meet a requirement that pops up.
On November 20th, 2006. See this statement in context.